Extract from the first preliminary Intelligence report of the unidentified flying objects designated as ‘Valkyrie’ detected in quadrant 23 of the airspace of the metropolitan area of Seville. The assessments and deductions have been made based on the testimony of Lieutenant Colonel Jack Preston and the video recording of the Eurofighter Typhoon fighter belonging to the 111 Diablos de Hispania squadron of the 11th Wing of the Air Force that he piloted during the battle of the #SevillaDisaster. Note that the MIU registers its disagreement with sending a preliminary report so quickly due to the fragility of the data and the lack of further references.

We recommend waiting for a detailed report before drawing any conclusions that determine future tactical directives.

MIU – Military Intelligence Unit
Preliminary Intelligence Report

File: K3Y27-2012
Case: Seville Disaster
Unidentified Flying Object: #Valkyrie
Classification: Top Secret
To: High Command and Allies

 

Through the information extracted in the report, and subsequent interrogation, of Lieutenant Colonel Jack Preston, in charge of air combat operations in the Seville area after the withdrawal of Commander Juan Aguilera, and the recording of his Typhoon combat aircraft camera, we can confirm the presence of at least two unidentified flying objects of similar design and configuration to that of the so-called ‘Armor’. These objects, which we have designated with the code name ‘Valkyrie’, were seen after the destruction of the 2012 UA rescuing ‘Armor’ after crashing on the outskirts of Seville. (See the ‘Armor’ preliminary file for more information.)

CRONOLOGY

According to the testimony of Lieutenant Colonel Jack Preston of the USAF and the time code of the video camera recording of his Eurofighter Typhoon fighter plane, belonging to the 111 Diablos de Hispania squadron of the 11th Wing, we have the record and registry of the presence of a new type of unidentified flying objects moments after the destruction over the sky of Seville in 2012 UA.

We can exactly confirm the presence of two ‘Valkyrie’ type units in the theater of operations during the interval from 23:25 GMT+1 and 23:29 GMT+1 on Friday, October 19, 2012.

The first warning was from one of the NATO Awacs radar operators, code name ‘Gavilán’. After two new unknown signals were detected leaving the mother ship ‘Vingilot’ (See the preliminary file of ‘Vingilot’ for more information) Lieutenant Colonel Jack Preston reported having sighted two new units similar to ‘Armor’ crossing paths with him. At that moment Preston claimed to see how they recovered the ‘Armor’ unit and ascended at full speed with it.

There is no report or contact that indicates that these new ‘Valkyrie’ units were detected until that moment. So we assume that their participation during the battle was to rescue the ‘Armor’ unit after the destruction of 2012 UA.

NATURE

There are still many internal discussions about the nature of ‘Valkyrie’, so we remind you again that this report is preliminary and no final conclusion can be drawn. The data obtained is insufficient due to the brevity of the encounter with Lieutenant Colonel Jack Preston and the environmental conditions during the few seconds in which the fighter plane’s camera was able to record the two ‘Valkyrie’ objects. Even so, our technicians have worked to obtain a video capture with the greatest possible clarity in which one of the ‘Valkyries’ can be seen with sufficient definition.

After seeing the image, our team raises important questions about the nature of the object with different theses:

• Armor of a large biological entity
• Robotic unit
• Mobile armor controlled by a pilot

For the moment we prefer the second and third options, since the first would not fit with our preliminary conclusions of the subject ‘Crimson Shadow (see its preliminary file for more information).

If there was a pilot, its control cabin would not be visible. Our deductions point towards what would be the head or, more likely, the torso of the object, as it is the most protected point. On the other hand, we do not rule out a robotic nature, whether controlled by AI or remotely.

ARMOR

With current data it is impossible for us to make any exact assessment of the armor of the ‘Valkyrie’ object but everything indicates that it is resistant and maneuverable. It appears to have a modular wing system that we believe can move and adjust according to combat conditions. In addition, it seems that there are different points that could serve as anchors for other devices or accessories.

Its propulsion system appears to be composed of three thrust points. One main one in the back and another secondary one in each of the lower extremities or “feet”. Their nature is completely unknown to us but they use an energy emission system similar to the ionic one but with greater power.

WEAPONS

None of the data we have worked with allows us to affirm that the ‘Valkyrie’ object has any weapons, apart from itself. Even so, the different anchors and the shape of its hand-like extremities make us venture the possibility of being able to carry external weapons attached or use them directly.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite not having detected any weapon system or having confirmed its participation in the battle, we doubt that ‘Valkyrie’ is limited to being a recovery unit. Taking into account the operational capacity of ‘Armor’, we believe that its purpose is combat, although with a much lower power than its own. As seen in the reproduction that our technicians have made, its size, possibly greater than 35 meters in height, and its anthropomorphic shape suggest a human influence on its design, but at this time it is impossible for us to specify what it could be.

Without more data to work with, it is impossible for us to continue advancing our conclusions regarding ‘Valkyrie’.